Skip to main content
MuonPartners
Services
Architecture

Solution design and technology roadmapping

Solution AssessmentTechnology RoadmapsIntegration DesignSolution ArchitectureTechnical Design
Cyber Security

Security assessments, IAM, and compliance

AssessmentsIAMComplianceSecurity BaselineCyber Innovation
Network and Platform

Network architecture and cloud platforms

Network DesignCloud StrategyModernisation
Enterprise Architecture

Business-technology alignment

Business AlignmentPortfolio AnalysisGovernance
View all services
ProjectsCase StudiesInsightsToolsAbout
Contact Us

Services

Architecture
Solution AssessmentTechnology RoadmapsIntegration DesignSolution ArchitectureTechnical Design
Cyber Security
AssessmentsIAMComplianceSecurity BaselineCyber Innovation
Network and Platform
Network DesignCloud StrategyModernisation
Enterprise Architecture
Business AlignmentPortfolio AnalysisGovernance
ProjectsCase StudiesInsightsToolsAboutContact
Get in Touch
MuonPartners

Strategic technology consulting for Australian organisations navigating complexity.

Services

  • Architecture
  • Cyber Security
  • Network and Platform
  • Enterprise Architecture

Company

  • About
  • Products
  • Frameworks
  • Cross-Framework Mapping
  • Projects
  • Case Studies
  • Insights
  • Contact

Contact

  • [email protected]
  • Australia
  • LinkedIn

© 2026 Muon Partners. All rights reserved.

ABN 50 669 022 315 · A Muon Group company.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
  1. Frameworks
  2. >C2M2
  3. >Risk Management
  4. >Risk Management - Objective 4
  5. >C2M2-RISK-4C
C2M2-RISK-4CActive

Cybersecurity controls are evaluated to determine whether they are designed appropriately and are operating as intended to mitigate identified cyber risks

Statement

Cybersecurity controls are evaluated to determine whether they are designed appropriately and are operating as intended to mitigate identified cyber risks

Location

Domain
Risk Management
Objective
Risk Management - Objective 4

Practice Details

Identifier
C2M2-RISK-4C
Domain
Risk Management
Objective
Objective 4
Maturity Level
MIL-3

Help Text

Cybersecurity control effectiveness should be evaluated by comparing the intended outcome of cybersecurity controls to the actual outcome. The organization may use performance metrics or other defined indicators to identify cybersecurity controls that are not designed appropriately. For example, if a biometric authentication device has a high false negative rate and exceptions are made for personnel access, the configuration of the control should be evaluated to determine if tuning is necessary to improve performance of the device.

Related Practices · Input From: Implementing ARCHITECTURE-1g provides input that may be useful for implementing this practice. · Progression: This practice is part of a practice progression. Practice progressions are groups of related practices that represent increasingly complete or more advanced implementations of an activity. The practices in this progression include: RISK-3b, RISK-3c, RISK-4c, RISK-4d.

AESCSF
AESCSF-RISK-4cequivalentvia derived-shared-practice-structure
View in graphReport an issue
← Back to Risk Management - Objective 4
Risk Management - Objective 45 controls
C2M2-RISK-4ARisk responses (such as mitigate, accept, avoid, or transfer) are implemented to address cyber risks, at least in an ad hoc mannerC2M2-RISK-4BA defined method is used to select and implement risk responses based on analysis and prioritizationC2M2-RISK-4CCybersecurity controls are evaluated to determine whether they are designed appropriately and are operating as intended to mitigate identified cyber risksC2M2-RISK-4DResults from cyber risk impact analyses and cybersecurity control evaluations are reviewed together by enterprise leadership to determine whether cyber risks are sufficiently mitigated, and risk tolerances are not exceededC2M2-RISK-4ERisk responses (such as mitigate, accept, avoid, or transfer) are reviewed periodically by leadership to determine whether they are still appropriate