Skip to main content
MuonPartners
Services
Architecture

Solution design and technology roadmapping

Solution AssessmentTechnology RoadmapsIntegration DesignSolution ArchitectureTechnical Design
Cyber Security

Security assessments, IAM, and compliance

AssessmentsIAMComplianceSecurity BaselineCyber Innovation
Network and Platform

Network architecture and cloud platforms

Network DesignCloud StrategyModernisation
Enterprise Architecture

Business-technology alignment

Business AlignmentPortfolio AnalysisGovernance
View all services
ProjectsCase StudiesInsightsToolsAbout
Contact Us

Services

Architecture
Solution AssessmentTechnology RoadmapsIntegration DesignSolution ArchitectureTechnical Design
Cyber Security
AssessmentsIAMComplianceSecurity BaselineCyber Innovation
Network and Platform
Network DesignCloud StrategyModernisation
Enterprise Architecture
Business AlignmentPortfolio AnalysisGovernance
ProjectsCase StudiesInsightsToolsAboutContact
Get in Touch
MuonPartners

Strategic technology consulting for Australian organisations navigating complexity.

Services

  • Architecture
  • Cyber Security
  • Network and Platform
  • Enterprise Architecture

Company

  • About
  • Products
  • Frameworks
  • Cross-Framework Mapping
  • Projects
  • Case Studies
  • Insights
  • Contact

Contact

  • [email protected]
  • Australia
  • LinkedIn

© 2026 Muon Partners. All rights reserved.

ABN 50 669 022 315 · A Muon Group company.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
  1. Frameworks
  2. >AESCSF
  3. >RISK
  4. >Analyse Cyber Risk
  5. >AESCSF-RISK-3a
AESCSF-RISK-3aActive

Cyber risks are prioritised based on estimated impact, at least in an ad hoc manner

Statement

Cyber risks are prioritised based on estimated impact, at least in an ad hoc manner

Context and Guidance: Potential impact to the organisation of identified risks should be evaluated and used to prioritise cyber risks. A higher priority cyber risk should receive greater attention when determining potential mitigations or responses. Prioritisation should focus on criteria deemed important to the enterprise such as safety impacts, operational impacts, and financial impacts (e.g., cost of recovery, potential cost of downtime or lost data). Prioritisation may use qualitative methods to indicate relative impact level (e.g., High, Medium, Low).

Related Practices • Progression: This practice is part of a practice progression. Practice progressions are groups of related practices that represent increasingly complete or more advanced implementations of an activity. The practices in this progression include: RISK-3a, RISK-3b.

Location

Domain
RISK
Objective
Analyse Cyber Risk

Practice Details

Identifier
AESCSF-RISK-3a
Type
Practice
Domain
RISK
Objective
Analyse Cyber Risk

Maturity Level

MIL-1MIL-2MIL-3

Security Profile

SP-1SP-2SP-3
ISM
ISM-1631relatedvia aescsf-reference
ISM-1163relatedvia aescsf-reference
ISM-1563relatedvia aescsf-reference
C2M2
C2M2-RISK-3Aequivalentvia derived-shared-practice-structure
NIST CSF
NIST-CSF-ID.RM-1relatedvia aescsf-reference
View in graphReport an issue
← Back to Analyse Cyber Risk
Analyse Cyber Risk7 controls
AESCSF-RISK-3aCyber risks are prioritised based on estimated impact, at least in an ad hoc mannerAESCSF-RISK-3bDefined criteria are used to prioritise cyber risks (for example, impact to the organisation, impact to the community...AESCSF-RISK-3cA defined method is used to estimate impact for higher priority cyber risks (for example, comparison to actual events...AESCSF-RISK-3dDefined methods are used to analyse higher priority cyber risks (for example, analysing the prevalence of types of at...AESCSF-RISK-3eOrganisational stakeholders from appropriate operations and business functions participate in the analysis of higher ...AESCSF-RISK-3fCyber risks are removed from the risk register or other artifact used to document and manage identified risks when th...AESCSF-RISK-3gCyber risk analyses are updated periodically and according to defined triggers, such as system changes, external even...