Skip to main content
MuonPartners
Services
Architecture

Solution design and technology roadmapping

Solution AssessmentTechnology RoadmapsIntegration DesignSolution ArchitectureTechnical Design
Cyber Security

Security assessments, IAM, and compliance

AssessmentsIAMComplianceSecurity BaselineCyber Innovation
Network and Platform

Network architecture and cloud platforms

Network DesignCloud StrategyModernisation
Enterprise Architecture

Business-technology alignment

Business AlignmentPortfolio AnalysisGovernance
View all services
ProjectsCase StudiesInsightsToolsAbout
Contact Us

Services

Architecture
Solution AssessmentTechnology RoadmapsIntegration DesignSolution ArchitectureTechnical Design
Cyber Security
AssessmentsIAMComplianceSecurity BaselineCyber Innovation
Network and Platform
Network DesignCloud StrategyModernisation
Enterprise Architecture
Business AlignmentPortfolio AnalysisGovernance
ProjectsCase StudiesInsightsToolsAboutContact
Get in Touch
MuonPartners

Strategic technology consulting for Australian organisations navigating complexity.

Services

  • Architecture
  • Cyber Security
  • Network and Platform
  • Enterprise Architecture

Company

  • About
  • Products
  • Frameworks
  • Cross-Framework Mapping
  • Projects
  • Case Studies
  • Insights
  • Contact

Contact

  • [email protected]
  • Australia
  • LinkedIn

© 2026 Muon Partners. All rights reserved.

ABN 50 669 022 315 · A Muon Group company.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
  1. Frameworks
  2. >AESCSF
  3. >RISK
  4. >Analyse Cyber Risk
  5. >AESCSF-RISK-3g
AESCSF-RISK-3gActive

Cyber risk analyses are updated periodically and according to defined triggers, such as system changes, external even...

Statement

Cyber risk analyses are updated periodically and according to defined triggers, such as system changes, external events, and information from other model domains

Context and Guidance: Cyber risks that can affect IT, OT, and information assets should be analysed periodically or according to defined triggers to determine if criteria such as impact or probability have changed. An increased probability of a risk being realised may drive a change to the priority of the cyber risk and a different strategy to mitigate the cyber risk. For each cyber risk, the organisation should assign a date by which the risk must be reevaluated or a defined trigger that would drive reevaluation. Triggers may include a date on which an asset is no longer supported by a vendor or an internal metric that has exceeded a tolerance level.

Location

Domain
RISK
Objective
Analyse Cyber Risk

Practice Details

Identifier
AESCSF-RISK-3g
Type
Practice
Domain
RISK
Objective
Analyse Cyber Risk

Maturity Level

MIL-1MIL-2MIL-3

Security Profile

SP-1SP-2SP-3
ISM
ISM-1631relatedvia aescsf-reference
ISM-1163relatedvia aescsf-reference
ISM-1563relatedvia aescsf-reference
C2M2
C2M2-RISK-3Gequivalentvia derived-shared-practice-structure
NIST CSF
NIST-CSF-ID.RM-1relatedvia aescsf-reference
View in graphReport an issue
← Back to Analyse Cyber Risk
Analyse Cyber Risk7 controls
AESCSF-RISK-3aCyber risks are prioritised based on estimated impact, at least in an ad hoc mannerAESCSF-RISK-3bDefined criteria are used to prioritise cyber risks (for example, impact to the organisation, impact to the community...AESCSF-RISK-3cA defined method is used to estimate impact for higher priority cyber risks (for example, comparison to actual events...AESCSF-RISK-3dDefined methods are used to analyse higher priority cyber risks (for example, analysing the prevalence of types of at...AESCSF-RISK-3eOrganisational stakeholders from appropriate operations and business functions participate in the analysis of higher ...AESCSF-RISK-3fCyber risks are removed from the risk register or other artifact used to document and manage identified risks when th...AESCSF-RISK-3gCyber risk analyses are updated periodically and according to defined triggers, such as system changes, external even...