Match Legitimate Resource Name or Location

Detection Strategy for Masquerading via Legitimate Resource Name or Location

Restrict File and Directory Permissions: Restricting file and directory permissions involves setting access controls at the file system level to limit which users, groups, or processes can read, write, or execute files. By configuring permissions appropriately, organizations can reduce the attack surface for adversaries seeking to access sensitive data, plant malicious code, or tamper with system files.

Enforce Least Privilege Permissions:

• Remove unnecessary write permissions on sensitive files and directories.
• Use file ownership and groups to control access for specific roles.

Example (Windows): Right-click the shared folder → Properties → Security tab → Adjust permissions for NTFS ACLs.

Harden File Shares:

• Disable anonymous access to shared folders.
• Enforce NTFS permissions for shared folders on Windows.

Example: Set permissions to restrict write access to critical files, such as system executables (e.g., /bin or /sbin on Linux). Use tools like chown and chmod to assign file ownership and limit access.

On Linux, apply: chmod 750 /etc/sensitive.conf chown root:admin /etc/sensitive.conf

File Integrity Monitoring (FIM):

• Use tools like Tripwire, Wazuh, or OSSEC to monitor changes to critical file permissions.

Audit File System Access:

• Enable auditing to track permission changes or unauthorized access attempts.
• Use auditd (Linux) or Event Viewer (Windows) to log activities.

Restrict Startup Directories:

• Configure permissions to prevent unauthorized writes to directories like C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu.

Example: Restrict write access to critical directories like /etc/, /usr/local/, and Windows directories such as C:\Windows\System32.

• On Windows, use icacls to modify permissions: icacls "C:\Windows\System32" /inheritance:r /grant:r SYSTEM:(OI)(CI)F
• On Linux, monitor permissions using tools like lsattr or auditd.

Execution Prevention: Prevent the execution of unauthorized or malicious code on systems by implementing application control, script blocking, and other execution prevention mechanisms. This ensures that only trusted and authorized code is executed, reducing the risk of malware and unauthorized actions. This mitigation can be implemented through the following measures:

Application Control:

• Use Case: Use tools like AppLocker or Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) to create whitelists of authorized applications and block unauthorized ones. On Linux, use tools like SELinux or AppArmor to define mandatory access control policies for application execution.
• Implementation: Allow only digitally signed or pre-approved applications to execute on servers and endpoints. (e.g., New-AppLockerPolicy -PolicyType Enforced -FilePath "C:\Policies\AppLocker.xml")

Script Blocking:

• Use Case: Use script control mechanisms to block unauthorized execution of scripts, such as PowerShell or JavaScript. Web Browsers: Use browser extensions or settings to block JavaScript execution from untrusted sources.
• Implementation: Configure PowerShell to enforce Constrained Language Mode for non-administrator users. (e.g., Set-ExecutionPolicy AllSigned)

Executable Blocking:

• Use Case: Prevent execution of binaries from suspicious locations, such as %TEMP% or %APPDATA% directories.
• Implementation: Block execution of .exe, .bat, or .ps1 files from user-writable directories.

Dynamic Analysis Prevention:

• Use Case: Use behavior-based execution prevention tools to identify and block malicious activity in real time.
• Implemenation: Employ EDR solutions that analyze runtime behavior and block suspicious code execution.

Code Signing: Code Signing is a security process that ensures the authenticity and integrity of software by digitally signing executables, scripts, and other code artifacts. It prevents untrusted or malicious code from executing by verifying the digital signatures against trusted sources. Code signing protects against tampering, impersonation, and distribution of unauthorized or malicious software, forming a critical defense against supply chain and software exploitation attacks. This mitigation can be implemented through the following measures:

Enforce Signed Code Execution:

• Implementation: Configure operating systems (e.g., Windows with AppLocker or Linux with Secure Boot) to allow only signed code to execute.
• Use Case: Prevent the execution of malicious PowerShell scripts by requiring all scripts to be signed with a trusted certificate.

Vendor-Signed Driver Enforcement:

• Implementation: Enable kernel-mode code signing to ensure that only drivers signed by trusted vendors can be loaded.
• Use Case: A malicious driver attempting to modify system memory fails to load because it lacks a valid signature.

Certificate Revocation Management:

• Implementation: Use Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) or Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) to block certificates associated with compromised or deprecated code.
• Use Case: A compromised certificate used to sign a malicious update is revoked, preventing further execution of the software.

Third-Party Software Verification:

• Implementation: Require software from external vendors to be signed with valid certificates before deployment.
• Use Case: An organization only deploys signed and verified third-party software to prevent supply chain attacks.

Script Integrity in CI/CD Pipelines:

• Implementation: Integrate code signing into CI/CD pipelines to sign and verify code artifacts before production release.
• Use Case: A software company ensures that all production builds are signed, preventing tampered builds from reaching customers.

Key Components of Code Signing

• Digital Signature Verification: Verifies the authenticity of code by ensuring it was signed by a trusted entity.
• Certificate Management: Uses Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to manage signing certificates and revocation lists.
• Enforced Policy for Unsigned Code: Prevents the execution of unsigned or untrusted binaries and scripts.
• Hash Integrity Check: Confirms that code has not been altered since signing by comparing cryptographic hashes.